Some guy at RedState.

[O]nce before, our nation was forced to repudiate the Supreme Court with mass bloodshed. We remain steadfast in our belief that this will not be necessary again, but only if those committed to justice do not waiver or compromise, and send a clear and unmistakable signal to their elected officials of what must be necessary to earn our support.

Or, to put it another way, bloodshed will be necessary if our elected officials don’t take the right stance on abortion.

If this was an article from a brown guy in reference to something vaguely Muslim-y, it would be instantly slammed as terrorism.

I’d also like to point out the hilarity of the fact that the right has been fighting over Roe v Wade even though it just plain ain’t gonna change any more than Brown v Board of Education. That’s how it is now, and yet it remains a ridiculous litmus test for Republican politicians.


One response to “QotD

  1. Because, as you know, there is no bloodshed in peaceful abortions…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s